Unser Politikblog | 5. September 2013
The
31.08. uses to be the official world-wide „anti-war day“. At the
31.08.2013, His Excellency, the President of the USA, has made the
decision to delay a possible imminent attack on Syria until approval
by the US Congress,
In
view of a threatening global war on the occasion of Syria, billions
of people are asking themselves, for what reasons His Excellency, Mr.
Barack Obama, the President of the USA, since about the 26.08.2013
has become so hasty about Syria, thus risking a global war and
putting billions of lifes at stake.
The
world public has a right to get answers to the following questions,
before any global war on the occasion of Syria is initiated, and
after such an initiation these questions would become even
significantly more urging.
We
have tried to get an interview from the President Council on Foreign
Relations, Dr. Richard Nathan Haass. With Mrs. Susan Rice (security
advisor) and His Excellency, Mr. Chuck Hagel (Minister of Defence),
the CFR holds two of the key persons advising His Excellency, the US
President, the CFR is one of the most powerful, if not the most
powerful, counselling organization to the US government regarding
matters of foreign and security policy.
In
addition to that, the CFR has excellent connections to prominent
newspapers and TV stations, e. g., NBC, CBS, and ABC.
This
significantly enhances, particularly in comparison to ordinary people
and even in comparison to most politicians world-wide, the ability of
the CFR to get its opinion and its issues heared, and to be
well-informed.
And
via his President Dr. Haass, the CFR is well-connected to the
Brookings Institution, which has published a highly interesting paper
on possible strategies to achieve a fall of His Excellency, Mr.
Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria.
Unfortunately,
the CFR seems to be too busy at the moment to be interviewed by us.
So
we put, as we have promised at the 31.08.2013 in our special
internet radio show „Macht und Menschenrechte“ on Syria, the
questions, which we are convinced, need to be answered, before a
world war is initiated on the occasion of Syria, into the internet in
order to have them discussed.
1.
How
do see your assessment of the 26.08.2013, that a limited strike
against Syria, which would not draw the USA into the Syrian civil
war, is possible, in the light of the warnings from Russia and China
of the 27.08.2013, which rather suggest, that it would cause a global
war?
2.
How could an attack on Syria „inflict enough pain and cost upon the
Syrians“ to „discourage them from resorting to chemial weapons
again“ and, at the same time, deter „any would-be user of
chemical, biological, or nuclear materials“ ?
3.Would
you also recommend military strikes, possibly together with the
allies from Great Britain, Qatar, and Ukraine, if the suspicion in
many media from the 28.01.2013, that the military contractor BritAm
has been hired to transport CW to Syria, turned out to be
well-grounded?
How
should the US government react regarding the claim of presumed
Qatarian clients of BritAm, that such a transport of CW has had the
acceptance of the USA?
4.
In
its article „Al-Qaida-Verbündete verfügen offenbar über
chemische Waffen“ of the 09.12.2012, the FAZ newspaper has reported
on warnings of the Syrian government and at least parts of the Syrian
rebels against the Al-Nousrah rebels, who have captured a chlorin gas
production facility. Doesn't it seem more probable, that the
Al-Nousrah rebels might be responsible for the presumed CW attacks at
Syria – particularly regarding their reported connection to the
criminal Al-Qaeda mercenary network?
5.
The
Saudian intelligence chief, His Excellency, Prince Bandar is reported
to have admitted Saudian
control
over Chechenyan mercenaries, who are deployed at Syria.
In
view of all the human, economical, and diplomatical costs the USA
have had to react on the presumed WMD use by Al-Qaeda at the
11.09.2001, shouldn't it be priority number one, to find out, if or
if not the Chechenyan fighters controlled by Saudi-Arabia are a
metaphore for a direct command of the Saudian government over
Al-Qaeda?
6.
Mrs. Susan Rice (security counsellor of His Excellency Mr. Barack
Obama, the President of the USA) and His Excellency, Mr. Chuck Hagel,
the Minister of Defence of the USA, belong to the CFR. How much
importance do assessments of the CFR regarding security policy have
on the US government in comparison to those of other think tanks, or
of CIA or Pentagon?
7.
In 2012, Mr. Matthew Kroenig and Mr. Nyall Ferguson have recommended
to attack Iran. Mr. Kroenig has made this recommendation even in the
magazine „Foreign Affairs“. In how far have these gentlemen
expressed the opinion of the CFR, of the CFR magazine „Foreign
Affairs“ or of specific personal or corporate members of the CFR?
8.
At
the 01.10.2012, the CFR and His Excellency, Mr. Ali Akbar Salehi, the
Foreign Minister of Iran, have had the courage and the wisdom to
transparently and directly talk to each other, and we still do not
have any world war on Iran.
Why
not bring to the table of the CFR His Excellency, Mr. Bashar Assad,
the President of Syria, together with representatives of the
governments of China, Great Britain, Russia, and the USA, with the
Saudian intelligence chief, His Excellency, Prince Bandar, with
respresenatives of the peaceful opposition, of the Al-Nousrah rebels,
and of BritAm representatives to enable a direct and transparent
discussion?
9.
According to news of the 30.08.2013, a speaker of the natonal
security council of the USA has said, that crucial interests are at
stake at Syria, and that countries need to be called to account for
the violation of international norms, such as for attacks with toxic
gas.
Please
tell us, which crucial private or public interests of whom exactly
are stake.
10.
In how far has the information from Mintpressnews of the 29.08.2013,
that the chemical catastrophe at the Damascene suburb Ghouta seems to
have been an unwanted tragical accident caused by a lack of
communication between the Al-Nousrah rebels and Syrian rebel groups,
already been checked and verified by CFR, by the Pentagon, the CIA,
and the UN?
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Hinweis: Nur ein Mitglied dieses Blogs kann Kommentare posten.